Report on the Audit of the Standalone Ind AS Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying standalone Ind AS financial statements of HCL Infosystems Limited(“the Company”), which comprise the Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2018, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Statement of Changes in Equity and the Statement of Cash Flows for the year then ended, and summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management’s Responsibility for the Standalone Ind AS Financial Statements
The Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for the matters stated in Section 134(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) with respect to the preparation of these standalone Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view of the state of affairs, profit/loss and other comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows of the Company in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in India, including the Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) prescribed under section 133 of the Act.
This responsibility also includes maintenance of adequate accounting records in accordance with the provisions of the Act for safe guarding the assets of the Company and for preventing and detecting frauds and other irregularities; selection and application of appropriate accounting policies; making judgments and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; and design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, relevant to the preparation and presentation of the standalone Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view and are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless management either intends to liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so. Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these standalone Ind AS financial statements based on our audit.
We have taken into account the provisions of the Act, the accounting and auditing standards and matters which are required to be included in the audit report under the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder.
We conducted our audit of the standalone Ind AS financial statements in accordance with the Standards on Auditing specified under Section 143(10) of the Act. Those Standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the standalone Ind AS financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and the disclosures in the standalone Ind AS financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the standalone Ind AS financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal financial control relevant to the Company’s preparation of the standalone Ind AS financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of the accounting estimates made by the Company’s Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the standalone Ind AS financial statements.
We are also responsible to conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in the auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify the opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of the auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause an entity to cease to continue as a going concern.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the standalone Ind AS financial statements.
Opinion
In our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us, the aforesaid standalone Ind AS financial statements give the information required by the Act in the manner so required and give a true and fair view in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in India of the state of affairs of the Company as at 31 March 2018, its loss and other comprehensive income,changes in equity and its cash flows for the year ended on that date.
Other Matter
Corresponding figures for the year ended 31 March 2017 have been audited by another auditor who expressed an unmodified opinion dated 30 May 2017 on the standalone Ind AS financial statements of the Company for the year ended 31 March 2017.
Our opinion on the standalone Ind AS financial statements is not modified in respect of the above matter.
Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements
1. As required by the Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2016 (“the Order”) issued by the Central Government in terms of Section 143(11) of the Act, we give in “Annexure B” a statement on the matters specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Order.
2. As required by Section 143(3) of the Act, we report that:
a) We have sought and obtained all the information and explanations which to the best of our knowledge and belief were necessary for the purposes of our audit.
b) In our opinion, proper books of account as required by law have been kept by the Company so far as it appears from our examination of those books.
c) The Balance Sheet, the Statement of Profit and Loss, the Cash Flow Statement and Statement of Changes in Equity dealt with by this Report are in agreement with the books of account
d) In our opinion, the aforesaid standalone Ind AS financial statements comply with the Indian Accounting Standards prescribed under section 133 of the Act.
e) On the basis of the written representations received from the directors as on 31 March 2018 taken on record by the Board of Directors, none of the directors is disqualified as on 31 March 2018 from being appointed as a director in terms of Section 164(2) of the Act.
f) With respect to the adequacy of the internal financial controls with reference to financial statements of the Company and the operating effectiveness of such controls, refer to our separate Report in “Annexure A”.
g) With respect to the other matters to be included in the Auditor’s Report in accordance with Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, in our opinion and to the best of our information and according to the explanations given to us:
i. The Company has disclosed the impact of pending litigations on its financial position in its standalone Ind AS financial statements; - Refer Note 38 to the standalone Ind AS financial statements.
ii. The Company has long term contracts as at 31 March 2018 for which there were no material foreseeable losses. The Company did not have any long-term derivative contracts as at 31 March 2018.
iii. There has been no delay in transferring amounts, required to be transferred, to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the Company.
iv. The disclosures in the financial statements regarding holdings as well as dealings in specified bank notes during the period from 8 November 2016 to 30 December 2016 have not been made since the requirement does not pertain to the financial year ended 31 March 2018. However, amounts as appearing in the audited standalone Ind AS financial statements for the period ended 31 March 2017 have been disclosed.
To the Members of HCL Infosytems Limited on the standalone financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2018 Report on the Internal Financial Controls under Clause (i) of Sub-section 3 of Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”)
We have audited the internal financial controls with reference to financial statements of HCL Infosytems Limited (“the Company”) as of 31 March 2018 in conjunction with our audit of the standalone Ind AS financial statements of the Company for the year ended on that date.
Management’s Responsibility for Internal Financial Controls
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal financial controls based on the internal control with reference to financial statements criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance Note on Audit of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting (“Guidance Note”) issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (“ICAI”). These responsibilities include the design, implementation and maintenance of adequate internal financial controls that were operating effectively for ensuring the orderly and efficient conduct of its business, including adherence to company’s policies, the safeguarding of its assets, the prevention and detection of frauds and errors, the accuracy and completeness of the accounting records, and the timely preparation of reliable financial information, as required under the Act. Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal financials controls with reference to financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the Guidance Note and the Standards on Auditing, issued by ICAI and deemed to be prescribed under Section 143(10) of the Act, to the extent applicable to an audit of internal financial controls, both applicable to an audit of Internal Financial Controls and, both issued by the ICAI. Those Standards and the Guidance Note require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether adequate internal financial controls with reference to financial statements was established and maintained and if such controls operated effectively in all material respects.
Our audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the adequacy of the internal financial controls system with reference to financial statements and their operating effectiveness. Our audit of internal financial controls with reference to financial statements included obtaining an understanding of internal financial controls with reference to financial statements, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements whether due to fraud or error.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion on the Company’s internal financial controls with reference to financial statements.
Meaning of Internal Financial Controls with reference to financial statements
A company’s internal financial control with reference to financial statements is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal financial control with reference to financial statements includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorisations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorised acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Inherent Limitations of Internal Financial Controls with reference to financial statements
Because of the inherent limitations of internal financial controls with reference to financial statements, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of the internal financial controls with reference to financial statements to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal financial control with reference to financial statements may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Opinion
In our opinion, the Company has, in all material respects, an adequate internal financial controls system with reference to financial statements and such internal financial controls with reference to financial statements were operating effectively as at 31 March 2018, based on the internal control with reference to financial statements criteria established by the Company considering the essential components of internal control stated in the Guidance by the ICAI.
Annexure B of the Independent Auditor’s Report to the members of HCL Infosystems Limited on the standalone financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2018
(i) (a) The Company has maintained proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets.
(b) The Company has a regular programme of physical verification of its fixed assets, by which all fixed assets are verified by the management in a phased manner over a period of three years. In our opinion, this periodicity of physical verification is reasonable having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its assets. Pursuant to the programme, certain fixed assets were physically verified during the year and no material discrepancies were noticed on such verification.
(c) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the title deeds of immovable properties included in fixed assets are held in the name of the Company, except for the immovable property mentioned below:
(Rs. in crores)
Particulars
|
Gross Block
|
Net Block
|
Land and Buildings at Ambattur, Chennai
|
5.58 crores
|
3.20 crores
|
(ii) The physical verification of inventory have been conducted at reasonable intervals by the management during the year. The discrepancies noticed on physical verification of inventory as compared to book records were not material.
(iii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not granted any loans, secured or insecured to Companies, firms, limited liability partnerships or other parties covered in the registered maintained under section 189 of the Act. According, the provisions of clause 3(iii) of the order are not applicable to the Company.
(iv) According to the information and explanations given to us, there are no loans given by the Company is respect of which provisions of Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 are applicable. Further, provisions of Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013 have been complied with respect to loans and guarantees given by the Company.
(v) The Company has not accepted any deposits from the public within the meaning of directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India, provisions of Section 73 to 76 of the Act, any other relevant provisions of the Act and the relevant rules framed thereunder.
(vi) The Central Government has not prescribed the maintenance of cost records under sub-section (1) of section 148 of the Act for any of the products of the Company.
(vii) (a) According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, amounts deducted/ accrued in the books of account in respect of undisputed statutory dues including Provident Fund, Employees’ State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales tax, Service tax, Goods and Service tax, Duty of customs, Duty of excise, Value added tax, Cess and other material statutory dues have generally been regularly deposited during the year by the Company with the appropriate authorities.
According to the information and explanations given to us, no undisputed amounts payable in respect of Provident Fund, Employees’ State Insurance, Income-tax, Sales tax, Service tax, Goods and Service tax, Duty of customs, Value added tax, Cess and other material statutory dues were in arrears as at 31 March 2018, for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable.
(b) According to the information and explanations given to us and the records of the Company examined by us, there are no dues of duty of customs as at 31 March 2018 which have not been deposited on account of a dispute. The particulars of Income tax, Service tax, Duty of excise and sales tax as at 31 March 2018 which have not been deposited on account of a dispute, are as follows:
Nature of the statute
|
Nature of dues
|
Amount (Rs. in crores)
|
Amount deposited (Rs. in crores)
|
Period to which the amount relates
|
Forum where the dispute is pending
|
Income tax Act, 1961
|
Income tax
|
1.93
|
|
2004-2005
2005-2006
2006-2007
|
Assessing Officer / Income Tax Appellate Tribunal / CIT
|
Income tax Act, 1961
|
Income tax
|
3.00
|
-
|
2011-2012
|
CIT (Appeal)
|
Income tax Act, 1961
|
Income tax
|
0.78
|
-
|
2012-2013
|
CIT (Appeal)
|
Income tax Act, 1961
|
Income tax
|
19.19
|
-
|
2013-2014
|
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
|
Income tax Act, 1961
|
Income tax
|
0.22
|
-
|
2014-2015
|
CIT (Appeal)
|
Central Excise Act, 1944
|
Excise
|
7.19
|
1.40
|
2002-2013
|
Commissioner of Appeals / CESTAT / High Court
|
Finance Act, 1994
|
Service tax
|
340.80
|
13.20
|
2003-2016
|
CESTAT / High Court / Commissioner (Appeals)
|
Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005
|
Sales tax
|
0.26
|
-
|
2008-2009
|
Deputy Commissioner Appeals
|
Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005
|
Sales tax
|
13.21
|
6.66
|
2006-2007
2008-2015
|
Joint Commissioner Appeals / High Court / Assistant Commissioner of Sales tax
|
Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975
|
Sales tax
|
0.17
|
0.05
|
2003-2006
|
Assistant Commissioner Sales tax / Joint Commissioner Appeals / Tribunal Sales tax
|
Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004
|
Sales tax
|
12.79
|
0.52
|
2006-2014
|
Tribunal of Sales tax / Deputy Commissioner Appeals
|
Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003.
|
Sales tax
|
0.21
|
-
|
2013-2014
|
Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax (Gujarat)
|
Jammu & Kashmir Value Added tax Act, 2005
|
Sales tax
|
2.71
|
0.04
|
2005-2006
2007-2008
2008-2009
|
Deputy Commissioner Appeals
|
Jharkhand Value Added TaxAct,2005
|
Sales tax
|
0.01
|
0.05
|
2011-2012
|
Joint Commissioner Appeal
|
Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.
|
Sales tax
|
2.48
|
1.60
|
2006-2013
|
Deputy Commissioner Appeals / Assessing Officer / High Court
|
Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.
|
Sales tax
|
1.25
|
1.13
|
2001-2017
|
Tribunal of Sales tax / Deputy Commissioner Appeals / Commercial Tax Officer
|
M.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2002
|
Sales tax
|
0.25
|
0.17
|
2011-2014
|
Joint Commissioner Appeal
|
Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002
|
Sales tax
|
3.67
|
1.10
|
2004-2013
|
Joint Commissioner Appeal
|
Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004
|
Sales tax
|
0.17
|
0.02
|
2012-2014
|
Deputy Commissioner Appeals / High Court
|
Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005
|
Sales tax
|
7.54
|
0.05
|
2006-2007
2007-2008 2010-2011 2012-2013
|
Deputy Commissioner Appeals / Tribunal of Sales tax
|
Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act-2003
|
Commercial
tax
|
179.82
|
80.06
|
2001-2002
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011 2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
|
Commercial Tax Officer/ High Court / Deputy Commissioner Appeals / Tribunal of Sales tax
|
Tamil Nadu General Sales tax Act, 1959
|
Sales tax
|
0.06
|
0.42
|
2004-2005
2007-2008
|
Commercial tax Officer / Deputy Commissioner Appeals
|
Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
|
Sales tax
|
0.90
|
6.26
|
2004-2005
2006-2007
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011 2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014 2015-2016
|
Commercial tax Officer / Deputy of Sales tax / Deputy Commissioner Appeals
|
The Uttaranchal Value Added Tax Act, 2005
|
Sales tax
|
0.63
|
0.09
|
2005-2006
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
|
Deputy Commissioner Commercial Tax
|
U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948
|
Sales tax
|
1.63
|
3.77
|
2002-2008
|
Assessing Officer / Tribunal Of Sales tax / High Court
|
U.P.Value Added Tax Act, 2008
|
Sales tax
|
18.20
|
5.54
|
2007-2016
|
Additional Commissioner (Appeals) / Joint Commissioner Appeals / Tribunal of Sales tax / Commercial Tax Officer
|
West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994.
|
Sales tax
|
7.74
|
2.76
|
2003-2016
|
Board of Sales tax / Additional Commissioner Appeals / Tribunal of Sales tax
|
(viii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has not defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowings to any bank or financial institution further, no bank loans or borrowings were taken from Government and there were no debentures issued during the year or outstanding as at 31 March 2018.
(ix) According to the information and explanations given to us, the moneys raised by way of term loans have been applied for the purposes for which they were obtained. The Company has not raised any moneys by way of initial public offer or further public offer (including debt instruments).
(x) According to the information and explanation given to us, no material fraud by the Company or on the Company by its officers or employees has been noticed or reported during the year.
(xi) The Company has not paid/ provided for managerial remuneration- Refer Note-47 to the financial statements. Accordingly, the provisions of Clause 3(xi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
(xii) According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company is not a Nidhi Company. Accordingly, the provisions of Clause 3(xii) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
(xiii) According to the information and explanation given to us and based on our examination of the records of the Company, all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with Sections 177 and 188 of the Act, where applicable, and the details of such transactions have been disclosed in the standalone Ind AS financial statements as required by the applicable accounting standards.
(xiv) The Company has not made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the year. Accordingly, the provisions of Clause 3(xiv) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
(xv) The Company has not entered into any non-cash transactions with its directors or persons connected with him. Accordingly, the provisions of Clause 3(xv) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
(xvi) The Company is not required to be registered under Section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. Accordingly, the provisions of Clause 3(xvi) of the Order are not applicable to the Company.
For B S R & Associates LLP
Chartered Accountants
Firm’s Registration No. 116231W/W-100024
Manish Gupta
Place: Gurugram Partner
Date: 29 May 2018 Membership No.: 095037
|